1. Courses
  2. Business & Finance
  3. Finance for Tech Teams
  4. Stop 2

35 minIntermediate

Unit economics

The P&L tells you whether Mangrove made money last year. Unit economics tells you whether the next order, the next channel or the next customer will. This lesson takes the finance view: which costs really belong to one order, what a partner order earns by channel once you count the cost of giving credit, and how to judge CAC, LTV and payback without the traps that make growth plans look better than they are.

By the end you can

  • Sort costs into variable, fixed and allocated, and explain why a fully loaded cost per order misleads decisions
  • Build the contribution of a $250 partner order for the app and phone channels, including the cost of 23 days of credit
  • Calculate CAC by channel and CAC payback in months for an app customer and a new partner shop
  • Work out cohort LTV on contribution, with and without discounting, and say when discounting changes the answer
  • Spot revenue LTV, blended CAC and averages that hide a losing segment

The everyday picture

A woman drives her own car as a taxi. Fuel and tyre wear cost her about $0.30 a kilometre. Insurance, her licence and the car loan cost $400 a month, whatever she drives. Last month she made 200 trips, so she tells herself each trip "costs" $2 of fixed cost plus its fuel.

At 9 pm a passenger wants a 4 km ride for $3. Fuel is $1.20. Add her $2 of fixed cost and the trip "costs" $3.20, so she says no. That is a mistake. The insurance and the loan are paid whether she takes the trip or not, and the trip would have left her $1.80 towards them. Each refusal also spreads the same $400 over fewer trips, so the rest look dearer.

The fixed costs still matter: all her trips together must earn more than $400 a month. Unit economics keeps the two questions apart: does one more unit earn more than it costs to deliver, and does all the units' earning cover the fixed costs?

Which costs belong to one order

You met the method in pm-27: the average 30-minute "Now" order has an $18 basket and, after goods, rider, packaging, payment fees and a $1.50 discount, loses $0.40. Without the discount, a repeat order earns $1.07. The finance question is which costs belong in that line.

Every cost falls into one of three groups for a given decision:

  • come with each order and disappear without it.
  • stay the same this month whatever the volume: engineers' salaries, rent, software licences.
  • are slices of shared costs handed out by a rule, such as share of revenue or orders. The total is real money; the slice stays when an order goes.

Here is how that goes wrong at Mangrove. In fin-01 you saw technology opex of $24M in FY2025. A slide in last year's budget pack divided it by about 21.6 million app orders a year and called the result "technology cost per order": about $1.11. Next to the $1.07 repeat order, every app order seems to lose 4 cents, and the slide concluded that app growth destroys value.

Three things are wrong with it. First, most of the $24M is staff, licences and network, which stay the same if Mangrove takes 1,000 fewer orders tomorrow. Second, the same technology runs 320 stores and the Partner app. Divide the $24M by every order and store checkout (about 146 million a year) instead and the "cost per order" falls to about $0.14. When the allocation key decides the answer, the answer is not about the order. Third, the technology cost that really grows with orders is small: the cloud services behind the customer app cost about $210,000 a month for about 1.8 million orders, about $0.12 an order.

That $0.12 is the of technology for an app order, or a little less, since part of that cloud bill is a base load that runs at 3 am too. It belongs in contribution, and pm-27's order line left it out. With it, the repeat order earns about $1.07 − $0.12 = $0.95, the number we use below.

The rule follows. Decisions about volume, price and channels use contribution, built from variable costs only. Fixed costs are compared in total with total contribution, at the level where someone could cut them: a team, a store, a product line.

Quick check

Which of these belongs in the contribution of one extra app order?

A partner order, line by line

About 4,000 partner orders arrive a week from corner shops, about 62% of them in the Partner app and about 1,500 by phone to the sales reps. The average order is about $250, and Mangrove's wholesale margin is about 7%, so each order leaves $17.50 of gross margin. Delivery from the distribution centre (DC) costs about $11 per drop. Then come the costs that depend on the channel, which pm-27 measured as : $0.20 for an app order and $1.75 for a phone order ($1.00 of rep time plus $0.75 for the 1 phone order in 12 corrected at about $9).

One more cost hides here. Shops have 14 days to pay, and on average they pay after 23. Until then Mangrove holds a instead of cash, money that cannot pay a supplier or reduce a loan. Mangrove's finance team charges money tied up at 12% a year, its rate for projects. So the on one order is $250 × 12% × 23 ÷ 365, about $1.89.

Output
One $250 partner order               App       Phone
Wholesale margin (7%)              +17.50     +17.50
Delivery drop from the DC          -11.00     -11.00
Cost to serve: handling             -0.20      -1.00   (phone: 10 min of rep time)
Cost to serve: corrections           0.00      -0.75   (1 in 12 x $9)
Contribution before credit          +6.30      +4.75
Cost of credit (23 days at 12%)     -1.89      -1.89
Contribution after credit           +4.41      +2.86
Where one order's $17.50 margin goes App order Drop −$11.00 $4.41 serve −$0.20 credit −$1.89 Phone order Drop −$11.00 $2.86 serve −$1.75 credit −$1.89 Each order moved to the app keeps $1.55 more
Each bar is the $17.50 margin of one $250 order. The drop takes $11 in both channels. The phone order's cost to serve is almost nine times the app's, and 23 days of credit cost the same in both, about $1.89.

Two things stand out. The drop is the biggest cost, so route density moves partner economics more than anything in the app. And the cost of credit is larger than the whole phone-versus-app difference. It is not an operating cost in the P&L, since interest sits below operating profit, but 4,000 orders a week at $1.89 is about $390,000 a year, roughly the $3M of partner receivables on the balance sheet at 12%.

Now total it by channel for a normal week:

ChannelOrders a weekContribution before creditAfter creditWeek, after credit
App2,500$6.30$4.41about $11,020
Phone1,500$4.75$2.86about $4,290
All partner orders4,000$5.72 average$3.83 averageabout $15,310

That is about $800,000 a year after credit, which has to cover the reps' salaries, the Lagoon Digital contract (about $390,000 a year) and the Partner app team. Moving 500 phone orders a week to the app adds about $40,000 a year, as pm-27 found. Getting shops to pay on their 14-day terms would save 9 days of credit, about $0.74 an order or roughly $150,000 a year, so paying in the app on delivery is a product feature with a finance payoff.

Quick check

A shop that orders by phone pays, on average, 45 days after delivery. What is its contribution after credit on a $250 order?

Think first: if every phone order moved to the app tomorrow, would Mangrove save $1.75 an order?

No. It would save the $0.75 of corrections, which are real credit notes and second deliveries. The $1.00 of rep time becomes cash only if the reps' hours go to something that pays, such as signing shops, or if Mangrove hires fewer reps. The app order still costs $0.20. And some shops might order less without the rep's call, losing $2.86 after credit for each order. A saving per order is a claim about what changes, so name the change.

CAC by channel and payback

is a channel's acquisition spend divided by the customers it brought in, and is the months of contribution it takes to earn that back. pm-27 used a CAC of about $12 for the app. Tomás split last month's paid acquisition by channel:

App channelSpendNew customersCACPayback
Referral rewards$24,0003,000$8month 4
Search ads$33,0003,000$11month 7
Social ads$38,0002,000$19never
All paid channels$95,0008,000about $12month 9

Payback uses pm-27's app customer (3 orders a month, 80% still ordering each month) at $0.95 an order. In month 1 a customer earns 3 × $0.95 = $2.85. In month 2 only 80% of the cohort is left, so expected contribution is $2.28, then $1.82, and so on. For a $12 CAC the running total passes zero in month 9, and it can never pass 3 × $0.95 × 5 = $14.25, because the expected lifetime is 1 ÷ (1 − 0.8) = 5 months. Social ads at $19 never pay back. A of $12 makes all three look acceptable.

The quick version, "CAC ÷ monthly contribution", gives $12 ÷ $2.85, about 4.2 months, because it assumes nobody leaves. The cohort payback takes more than twice as long, and it is the one finance teams use.

A new partner shop works the same way, with bigger numbers and a ramp. Signing one shop takes a rep about 10 hours, counting visits to shops that say no: about $60 at $6 an hour fully loaded. Add a $30 welcome credit on the first order (counted here, so it stays out of that order's contribution) and CAC is about $90. New shops place orders in the app and start small: about 3 orders in month 1, 5 in month 2, 7 in month 3, then about 9 a month like an average shop (4,000 orders a week across 1,800 shops). About 98% of shops still order each month.

Output
New partner shop, app orders at $4.41 after credit, CAC $90
Month  Orders  Shops left  Contribution  Cumulative
  1      3       100%        $13.23       -$76.77
  2      5        98%        $21.61       -$55.16
  3      7        96%        $29.64       -$25.52
  4      9        94%        $37.35       +$11.83   pays back
 12      9        80%        $31.78      +$284.98
Cash from one new partner shop $0 −$90 +$285 pays back in month 4 full volume from day one: 2.3 mo ramp 3, 5, 7, 9 a month 0 4 8 12 months after signing
A new shop starts $90 in the hole. Because it orders 3, 5 and 7 times in its first three months, it pays back in month 4; a shop at full volume from day one would take about 2.3 months. By month 12 it has earned about $285 net of CAC.

A partner shop pays back far faster than an app customer, because it brings about $40 of contribution a month against $2.85. That argues for signing shops. The limit is that the 1,800 shops Mangrove serves were probably the easiest to sign, so the next shop usually costs more to win and may sit off the usual routes.

Quick check

Why does the app's blended CAC of about $12 mislead the marketing budget?

Cohort LTV, with and without discounting

is the total contribution you expect from a customer over the time they keep buying. Build it from a : all customers who joined in the same month, followed month by month, as in pm-23. Each month's contribution is orders × contribution per order × the share of the cohort still buying.

A dollar in month 30 is worth less than a dollar today, which could repay debt or fund a project earning 12% a year. divides each future month by (1 + r) to the power of the month. A 12% yearly rate is about 0.949% a month, since 1.12 to the power of 1/12 is about 1.00949.

Output
                         Undiscounted   Discounted at 12%   Drop
App customer (5 months)     $14.25          $13.60           about 5%
Partner shop (lifetime)     about $1,930    about $1,290     about a third
Partner shop (36 months)    about $970      about $830       about 15%

For the app customer, discounting barely matters, because most of the money arrives in the first months. For a partner shop that stays for years (98% monthly retention means an expected lifetime of about 50 months), it removes about a third. Long lifetimes are also where the forecast is weakest, so many finance teams cap LTV at a horizon such as 36 months. Discounted and capped, a new shop is worth about $830 against a $90 CAC, and that is the number to bring to a budget meeting.

Three mistakes turn LTV into a sales slide:

  1. LTV on revenue. $250 × 9 orders a month × 50 months is $112,500 per shop, and means nothing when Mangrove keeps a few dollars an order. Use contribution after credit.
  2. Blended CAC. One CAC across channels, or across old cities and new ones, hides the channel or city that never pays back.
  3. Averages that hide segments. The average shop pays in 23 days; a phone shop that pays at 45 days keeps about $1.05 an order instead of $2.86. The average drop costs $11; a shop off the usual routes may cost $14. Split by channel, payment days, city and route before you trust an average.

Quick check

You discount two LTVs at 12% a year. Which one falls the most, in percentage terms?

Do it

Build a one-page unit economics sheet for one channel your team runs, ready for a budget review.

  1. Pick the unit and the channel

    One order, shop-month or subscriber-month, for one channel, from last month's actual data.

  2. Sort every cost line

    For each line ask what changes if one more unit happens. Mark it variable, fixed or allocated, and write its source (finance ledger, cloud bill, ops report).

  3. Measure the marginal technology cost

    Cloud cost of the services that handle this unit ÷ units. Note any base load that does not move with volume.

  4. Add the cost of credit for business customers

    Amount owed × the finance team's yearly rate × average days to pay ÷ 365. Ask finance for the rate and for days to pay by segment.

  5. Add CAC and cohort payback by channel

    Spend per channel ÷ customers that channel won. Payback month from cohort retention, not from CAC ÷ monthly contribution.

  6. Compare fixed costs in total

    Total contribution per month against the fixed costs someone could cut. Write the volume at which they are covered.

    Output
    Partner orders, app channel, September          per order
    Wholesale margin 7% of $250                       +17.50
    Delivery drop                                     -11.00
    Cost to serve (support, servers, payments)         -0.20
    Contribution before credit                         +6.30
    Cost of credit: 250 x 12% x 23 / 365               -1.89
    Contribution after credit                          +4.41
    
    New shop: CAC $90 (10 h rep time $60 + welcome credit $30)
    Ramp 3, 5, 7, then 9 orders a month; 98% of shops stay each month
    Cohort payback: month 4      LTV 36 months, discounted: about $830
    
    Fixed: partner squad $480,000 a year
    Covered at about 109,000 extra app orders a year (2,100 a week)

Bring it to your team

Ask these whenever a cost per order or a growth plan reaches a budget review.

  • Which lines in this cost per order change if we take one more order, and which are allocations?
  • What is our marginal cloud cost per order, and how much of the bill is a base load?
  • For business customers, how many days do they really take to pay, and is the cost of credit in the numbers?
  • What is CAC per channel, and in which month does each channel's cohort pay back?
  • Is LTV built on contribution, discounted, and capped at a horizon we can defend?
  • Which fixed costs does this channel's total contribution need to cover, and at what volume?

Red flags

  • A "fully loaded cost per order" used to decide whether to take more orders.
  • A cost per order that changes a lot when someone changes the allocation key.
  • LTV on revenue or basket value, or with no horizon for customers who stay for years.
  • One blended CAC for every channel or city.
  • Payback calculated as CAC ÷ monthly contribution with no churn.
  • B2B unit economics that ignore payment days.

Practice

Contribution per partner order, by channel

The table partner_order holds a sample of one week's partner orders: channel is 'app' or 'phone', value_cents is the order value and corrected is true if the order needed a correction after delivery. Use these constants: wholesale margin 7% of value, delivery drop 1100 cents, handling 100 cents for a phone order and 20 cents for an app order, and 900 cents for each corrected order. Return one row per channel with channel, orders (the count) and avg_contribution_cents: the average contribution per order after margin, drop, handling and corrections, rounded to whole cents. Leave the cost of credit out.

SQL exerciseRuns in a real PostgreSQL inside your browser
-- Average contribution per order by channel (cents, rounded)
-- margin 7% of value, drop 1100, handling: phone 100, app 20,
-- each corrected order costs 900 more
SELECT channel,
       count(*) AS orders,
       round(avg(value_cents * 0.07 - 1100)) AS avg_contribution_cents
FROM partner_order
GROUP BY channel;
Ctrl + Enter runs
Show a solution
SQL
SELECT channel,
       count(*) AS orders,
       round(avg(value_cents * 0.07 - 1100
                 - CASE WHEN channel = 'phone' THEN 100 ELSE 20 END   -- handling
                 - CASE WHEN corrected THEN 900 ELSE 0 END            -- fixing errors
       )) AS avg_contribution_cents
FROM partner_order
GROUP BY channel;

Each order's costs are subtracted inside avg(), so the corrections are spread over all orders in the channel, exactly like the $0.75 average in the lesson. This sample's phone orders had 2 corrections in 6, far more than the usual 1 in 12, which is why they earn only $2.50 here. A small sample can mislead, so check the count before you trust an average.

Pass the exercise to finish this task.

Should reps get a sign-up bonus in a new city?

For 2027, the head of partner sales proposes a $60 bonus for each shop a rep signs in a new city, on top of the usual $90 CAC. Shops there are off the current routes, so each drop costs about $14 instead of $11. Assume new-city shops order in the app at $250 an order, about 6 orders a month from the first month, pay after 23 days (credit cost $1.89 an order), and 98% stay each month. Calculate the contribution per order and per month, the CAC, the simple payback and the cohort payback month, and recommend what to change first. Then check what happens if the drop cost falls back to $11.

  • Your contribution per order uses margin, drop, cost to serve and credit (about $1.41)
  • You put the bonus in CAC ($150) and count it once
  • Your payback counts churn (about month 22), not only CAC ÷ monthly contribution (about 18 months)
  • You find that the drop cost moves payback far more than the bonus does
  • Your recommendation names a lever, its owner and a result that would make you stop or scale
Show a model answer
Output
Per order   17.50 - 14.00 drop - 0.20 serve - 1.89 credit = $1.41
Per month   6 orders x $1.41                             = about $8.46
CAC         $90 + $60 bonus                              = $150
Simple payback   150 / 8.46                              = about 18 months
Cohort payback (98% stay each month)                     = month 22
LTV, 50-month lifetime, undiscounted   8.46 x 50         = about $423 (2.8 : 1)

Without the bonus (CAC $90)              cohort payback month 12
Drop back to $11, with the bonus         $4.41 x 6 = $26.46 a month, payback month 6

The drop cost matters far more than the bonus. At $14 a drop, each order keeps only $1.41, and even without the bonus a shop takes a year to pay back. Bringing the drop to $11 makes the bonus affordable, with payback in month 6. Recommend that the head of partner sales and the DC transport lead sign shops along a few dense clusters first, so trucks can add drops to existing routes, and pay the bonus only in those clusters. Review after three months: scale if drop cost in the clusters is near $11 and shops order about 6 times a month; stop the bonus if drops stay above $13.

Check yourself

A music streaming service spreads its $50M a year of engineering and office costs over 10 million subscribers and says each subscriber "costs" $0.42 a month on top of royalties. It wants to drop a $3 student plan whose royalties and payment fees are $2.40 a month. What should the finance partner say?

A wholesale distributor sells $400 orders at a 6% margin. Shops pay on average 60 days after delivery and the company's cost of money is 10% a year. Roughly how much of the order's margin does credit consume?

A meal-kit company's deck says CAC payback is 3 months: CAC $60, and an active customer brings $20 of contribution a month. Half of new customers cancel after the first month, and the rest stay about 10 months. What is the strongest objection?

Flashcards

Open my review

Key takeaways

  • Contribution uses variable costs only. Technology's marginal cost for an app order is up to about $0.12 of cloud; the $1.11 "fully loaded" figure is an allocation.
  • A $250 partner order keeps $6.30 in the app and $4.75 by phone; 23 days of credit then take about $1.89 from both.
  • Calculate CAC and payback per channel and per cohort: social ads at $19 never pay back an app customer, while a $90 partner shop pays back in month 4.
  • Build LTV on contribution, discount it and cap the horizon when customers stay for years; never use revenue.

Sources and further reading

Episode transcriptThe dollar eleven that wasn't real · about 12 minutes · tap any line to play from there
  1. NadiaImran, last year's budget pack had a slide called technology cost per order. Do you remember the number?
  2. ImranA dollar eleven. Someone took the whole twenty-four million dollar technology bill and divided it by about twenty-one and a half million app orders.
  3. NadiaAnd a repeat app order earns about a dollar seven. So the slide said every app order loses four cents, and growing the app destroys value.
  4. ImranWhich felt wrong, but I couldn't say why in the meeting.
  5. NadiaToday you'll be able to. And we'll do the partner side properly, with credit, acquisition cost and lifetime value.
  6. NadiaStart with a taxi driver who owns her car. Fuel and tyres cost about thirty cents a kilometre. Insurance, licence and the car loan cost four hundred dollars a month, whatever she drives.
  7. NadiaLast month she made two hundred trips, so she tells herself each trip carries two dollars of fixed cost. At nine at night someone offers three dollars for a four kilometre ride.
  8. ImranFuel is a dollar twenty. Plus her two dollars, that's three twenty. So she says no.
  9. NadiaAnd she's wrong. The insurance gets paid whether she takes the ride or not. The ride would have left her a dollar eighty towards it. Refuse enough rides like that and the same four hundred dollars sits on fewer trips, so the rest look worse.
  10. ImranBut she still has to cover the four hundred.
  11. NadiaYes, all her trips together. That's the split. Does one more unit earn more than it costs to deliver? And does all the units' earning cover the fixed costs? Two questions, kept apart.
  12. ImranSo the dollar eleven mixed them up.
  13. NadiaThree ways. Most of that twenty-four million is staff, licences and network. None of it changes if we take a thousand fewer orders tomorrow. That's fixed cost.
  14. NadiaSecond, the same technology runs three hundred and twenty stores and your Partner app. Divide by every order and store checkout instead, about a hundred and forty-six million a year, and the cost per order drops to about fourteen cents.
  15. ImranSame money, different divisor, completely different answer.
  16. NadiaThat's how you know it's an allocation. When the rule for handing out a shared cost decides the answer, the answer isn't telling you anything about the order.
  17. ImranAnd the third way?
  18. NadiaThe tech cost that really grows with orders is small. The cloud services behind the customer app cost about two hundred and ten thousand dollars a month for about one point eight million orders. Roughly twelve cents an order, maybe a little less, because part of that bill runs at three in the morning too.
  19. ImranSo twelve cents is the marginal cost. And that one does belong in the order.
  20. NadiaIt does. Take it off the dollar seven and the repeat order earns about ninety-five cents. Small change, but it's honest.
  21. ImranNow my world. Partner orders.
  22. NadiaIf you can see the screen, the first diagram shows two long bars, one for an app order and one for a phone order. Each bar is the seventeen fifty of margin on a two hundred and fifty dollar order.
  23. NadiaThe big grey block in both is the delivery drop from the DC, about eleven dollars. Then a red slice for cost to serve. Twenty cents in the app. A dollar seventy-five by phone, a dollar of rep time plus seventy-five cents of corrections.
  24. ImranThat leaves six thirty for the app and four seventy-five for the phone. That's the dollar fifty-five gap I already knew from the product side.
  25. NadiaThen there's a yellow slice you probably didn't count. Credit. Shops have fourteen days to pay, and on average they pay after twenty-three.
  26. ImranBut we get the money in the end. Why is that a cost?
  27. NadiaBecause for twenty-three days that two hundred and fifty dollars can't pay a supplier or reduce a loan. Finance charges money tied up at twelve percent a year. Two fifty times twelve percent times twenty-three over three sixty-five is about a dollar eighty-nine.
  28. ImranA dollar eighty-nine. That's more than the whole phone versus app difference.
  29. NadiaRight. So after credit the app order keeps about four forty-one and the phone order about two eighty-six. Across four thousand orders a week, credit costs roughly three hundred and ninety thousand dollars a year.
  30. ImranSo if shops paid on their fourteen-day terms, that's nine days back.
  31. NadiaAbout seventy-four cents an order, roughly a hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year. Paying in the app on delivery is a product feature with a finance payoff.
  32. NadiaHere's one to think about. If every phone order moved to the app tomorrow, would we save a dollar seventy-five an order? Take a second.
  33. ImranWe'd save the corrections for sure. The rep time, only if the reps do something else that pays, or we hire fewer. And the app order still costs twenty cents.
  34. NadiaExactly. And some shops might order less without the rep's call. A saving per order is a claim about what changes, so name the change.
  35. ImranOkay, acquisition. In the product lesson we used a CAC of about twelve dollars for an app customer.
  36. NadiaThat's the blend. Tomás split it. Referral rewards cost about eight dollars a customer, search ads about eleven, social ads about nineteen.
  37. ImranAnd a customer is worth what, over their life?
  38. NadiaThree orders a month at ninety-five cents, and eighty percent still ordering each month, so an expected lifetime of five months. At most about fourteen twenty-five.
  39. ImranSo social ads at nineteen never pay back. And the twelve dollar average made them look fine.
  40. NadiaThat's blended CAC. And watch the payback math too. Twelve divided by two eighty-five a month says about four months. But that assumes nobody leaves.
  41. ImranWith eighty percent staying each month, the cohort earns less every month.
  42. NadiaSo the running total crosses zero in month nine. More than twice as long. Finance uses the cohort version.
  43. ImranNow a new partner shop. The second diagram is a curve that starts at minus ninety dollars.
  44. NadiaNinety is the CAC. About ten hours of a rep's time, counting the shops that say no, so about sixty dollars, plus a thirty dollar welcome credit on the first order.
  45. NadiaThe shop starts small. About three orders in month one, five, then seven, then about nine a month like an average shop. At four forty-one each after credit, and ninety-eight percent of shops staying each month.
  46. ImranAnd the curve crosses zero in month four.
  47. NadiaRight. A dashed line shows a shop at full volume from day one, which would pay back in about two point three months. The ramp nearly doubles it. By month twelve the real shop is about two hundred and eighty-five dollars ahead.
  48. ImranSo shops pay back way faster than app customers. Forty dollars a month against two eighty-five.
  49. NadiaThey do. One caution. The eighteen hundred shops we already serve were probably the easiest to sign. The next ones cost more to win, and they may be off the usual routes.
  50. ImranLifetime value next. Do we discount it?
  51. NadiaIt depends when the money arrives. Twelve percent a year is about point nine five percent a month. The app customer's value drops only about five percent, from fourteen twenty-five to about thirteen sixty, because most of it comes in the first months.
  52. NadiaA partner shop stays about fifty months on average. Its lifetime value falls from about nineteen hundred and thirty dollars to about twelve hundred and ninety. Roughly a third.
  53. ImranAnd the forecast fifty months out is shaky anyway.
  54. NadiaSo many finance teams cap it, say at thirty-six months. Capped and discounted, a new shop is worth about eight hundred and thirty dollars. That's the number to bring to a budget meeting.
  55. ImranLet me tell you the version that goes wrong. A rep bonus. Sixty dollars per shop signed in a new city, where drops cost about fourteen dollars instead of eleven.
  56. NadiaRun it.
  57. ImranSeventeen fifty minus fourteen, minus twenty cents, minus a dollar eighty-nine. A dollar forty-one an order. Six orders a month is about eight forty-six. And CAC goes to a hundred and fifty.
  58. NadiaPayback, counting shops that leave, is about month twenty-two. Get the drop back to eleven dollars and it's month six, even with the bonus. So the drop is the lever, and the bonus is a detail.
  59. ImranSign shops in dense clusters along existing routes first.
  60. NadiaThat's what the worked example in the lesson builds on. The CFO asks whether partner orders even pay for an eight-person squad costing four hundred and eighty thousand a year.
  61. ImranAnd you don't answer with the dollar eleven.
  62. NadiaNo. Each extra app order brings four forty-one after credit. The squad is a fixed cost, so it needs about a hundred and nine thousand extra orders a year, roughly twenty-one hundred a week. The case rests on growth, and that's a business case question.
  63. NadiaIn the Do it section you build a one-page sheet for one channel. Sort every line by asking what changes if one more order happens. Measure the marginal cloud cost. Add the cost of credit for business customers. Then CAC and cohort payback by channel, and finally the fixed costs, compared in total.
  64. ImranAnd the practice has a SQL query. One row per channel with the order count and the average contribution after margin, drop, handling and corrections.
  65. ImranMy questions for the next budget review. Which lines in this cost per order change if we take one more order? How many days do shops really take to pay? And in which month does each channel's cohort pay back?
  66. NadiaGood. Add one. Is lifetime value built on contribution, discounted, and capped at a horizon we can defend?
  67. ImranTakeaways. One, contribution uses only costs that change with the order. The twelve cents of cloud counts, the dollar eleven doesn't.
  68. ImranTwo, a partner order keeps six thirty in the app and four seventy-five by phone, and then credit takes about a dollar eighty-nine from both.
  69. ImranThree, CAC and payback per channel and per cohort, never one blended number.
  70. NadiaOne nuance on the first. The fixed costs don't vanish. Compare them in total with total contribution, at the level where someone could actually cut them. And the real rules for a company come from its finance team and auditors.
  71. ImranNext time, budgets. The roles that start in April, capex and opex, and why some software lands on the balance sheet.
Finished reading?Mark it complete to fill in its stop on your course line.

Use it at work

Monthly sales report

Revenue, orders and average order value per month, with the change on the month before.

Open in the SQL Lab
Next stopBudgets, capex and opex
Was this lesson helpful?
Questions and discussion

Loading the discussion…