Watching the work
What people tell you about their work and what they actually do are different, and most product opportunities hide in that difference. This lesson shows you how to visit a store or a partner shop, watch real work without getting in the way, spot the workarounds, and turn what you saw into a journey map and a service blueprint.
By the end you can
- Plan and run a field visit at a store, a warehouse dock or a partner shop
- Use the apprentice stance to see the steps people forget to mention
- Spot workarounds such as side spreadsheets, notebooks and chat groups, and name the need behind each one
- Put a cost on a workaround in minutes and errors across all your sites
- Draw a journey map and a service blueprint with the workarounds marked
The everyday picture
Ask a good home cook for her recipe and she says, "Some onions, a little salt, cook until it's done." Stand in her kitchen and you see three onions sliced very thin, two big pinches of salt, a squeeze of lime she forgot to mention, and the pan pulled off the heat the moment the smell changes. She didn't lie. She has made the dish so often that the important parts became invisible to her.
Work is the same. A receiving clerk will tell you the official steps. Watch her and you see the notebook in her apron pocket, the walk to the front of the store to find Wi-Fi, and the photo she posts to the store's chat group. Those are the parts you need.
Why you have to watch
Interviews (User interviews that don't lie) capture stories. Watching captures what people no longer notice. Three things mostly show up only when you watch:
- Tacit steps. Tacit knowledge is the know-how people use without thinking: which carton to open first, which barcode never scans, which colleague to ask.
- The environment. Noise, glare on the screen, gloves, a queue at the till, no signal at the back of the store, a customer interrupting every two minutes.
- Workarounds people think are normal. The notebook, the spreadsheet, the chat group. Nobody mentions them because they've stopped seeing them as unusual.
The classic method is contextual inquiry, developed by Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt and described in their book Contextual Design (1998). You go where the work happens and learn the job the way an apprentice learns from a master: they work, you watch, and you ask about what you see as it happens. Nielsen Norman Group sums up its four principles as context (go where the work is), partnership (they steer as much as you do), interpretation (check what you think you saw with them) and focus (know what you are there to learn).
Watching also beats predicting at a much larger scale. When Safaricom and Vodafone piloted M-Pesa in Kenya from October 2005, the service was designed for microfinance customers to receive and repay loans. Pilot customers adopted it for other uses, and the service was refocused on sending money home and making payments before its full launch in March 2007. The famous product came from watching what pilot users actually did with it.
Quick check
A clerk tells you receiving a delivery takes "about 20 minutes". You time a real delivery at 51 minutes. What is the most likely explanation?
People describe their work as it is supposed to go. The extra half hour is usually tacit steps and workarounds. Today might also be unusual, which is why you check against a second delivery or a diary study before you build a business case on one visit. Ignoring it throws away your best finding.
Running a field visit on the shop floor
Before you go. Pick one workflow and one real occurrence of it: the morning DC delivery at a store, Ravi's Tuesday call with his sales rep, a rider's evening shift. Watch the real thing, never a demo of it. Get permission from the store manager, and tell the area manager. For a partner shop, the owner's yes is enough. Plan for safety and space: stand behind the line at the loading dock, never block the till, and wear what staff wear if the site requires it. Bring a field-note sheet, a watch for timing and a phone for photos, which you take only with permission and never of customers or card details. Go as a pair at most. More visitors turn the visit into an inspection.
While you are there.
- Set the stance in one sentence: "Please work as you normally would. Treat me like a new hire who is shadowing you."
- Watch first. Ask at natural pauses: "What did you just do there?" "Why that way?" "When did that last go wrong?"
- Time every step, and note every screen, paper, device and person it touches.
- Ask to see the artefacts: the notebook, the spreadsheet, the chat group. Look only at what they choose to show you.
- Watch one person at a time. If a manager comes over to explain how it "should" work, thank her, offer to talk later, and keep watching the clerk.
- If the visit turns into a complaint session, write the list down, thank them, promise to pass it on, and return to the work.
- Accept a cup of tea, then let them get back to work. You are an apprentice, not a guest.
- Keep it under about two hours, the limit Nielsen Norman Group recommends for field sessions. Book a second visit rather than staying all day.
Afterwards. Write up your notes the same day. Then play them back to the person you watched: "Here is what I think I saw. What did I get wrong?" That check, the interpretation principle, catches your misreadings before they reach a spec.
The same method works beyond stores. At a partner shop, sit in during the rep's call and count the interruptions. At a distribution centre, stand at the dock through one truck. With riders, ride along for an evening shift and watch what they do on the app between deliveries.
Quick check
You are shadowing a receiving clerk when the store manager walks over and starts explaining how receiving is supposed to work. What do you do?
You came to see the work as it is done. The manager's account is the official version, useful later but not a replacement. A joint explanation turns into a group summary, and the clerk will hold back in front of her boss. Leaving wastes a real delivery you may not see again soon.
Spotting workarounds
A workaround is something people do to get the job done that the official tool or process doesn't support. Each one is a need your product misses, plus the user's own solution to it. That makes workarounds the most valuable thing you can find on a visit. Look for these signals:
- Paper next to a screen: notebooks, printed lists, sticky notes on the scanner, a list on the back of a calendar.
- A side spreadsheet that nobody officially owns and everyone depends on: "the expiry sheet", "Rina's file".
- Chat groups doing system work: orders sent as photos, price changes posted as images, approvals given with a thumbs-up.
- Retyping: the same data entered into two systems, or read off one screen and typed into another.
- Phone calls to check something the system already shows, because nobody trusts the screen.
- Personal tools at work: a personal phone's camera or calculator, a personal mobile wallet.
- An unofficial expert: "Ask Ama, she knows how to fix that."
- Steps in odd places: walking to the front of the store to get a signal so the app will sync.
Read a workaround like a spec. The columns of a side spreadsheet are the fields people need. The chat group shows who needs to know what, and how fast. The notebook shows what the clerk checks on Monday morning. Don't rush to ban workarounds either. They often do jobs you can't see yet. A store's chat group carries price changes, and it may also be where the area manager thanks staff for a good week. Remove it without replacing those jobs and people will rebuild it the next day.
Then put a cost on each one: minutes per occurrence, times occurrences per day, times the number of sites, plus the errors it causes. Twenty-one minutes of workarounds per delivery, at about one delivery a day across 320 stores, is roughly 112 staff hours every day. That number turns "staff find it annoying" into a case a director can act on (Business cases).
Quick check
Mangrove's order desk retypes about 1,500 phone orders a week from photos in the sales reps' chat group. Each takes about 3 minutes, and about 1 order in 12 later needs a correction. Roughly what does this cost each week?
1,500 × 3 minutes is 4,500 minutes, which is 75 hours. 1,500 ÷ 12 is 125. The last option assumes checking removes errors, but the correction log you were given already counts the errors that got through.
Journey maps and service blueprints
A journey map shows one person's steps over time in one scenario, with what they do, use, think and feel, and where it hurts. Draw it from what you observed and heard, never from imagination in a meeting room. Keep it to one kind of person and one scenario, such as "a clerk receiving the morning DC delivery". Mark how long each step took and which steps are workarounds.
Seeing behind the counter
A service blueprint adds the people and systems behind a journey. G. Lynn Shostack introduced the idea in Harvard Business Review in 1984, and Nielsen Norman Group calls it "a part two to customer journey maps". It has lanes for the customer's actions, the frontstage (the staff and screens the customer deals with), the backstage (work the customer never sees) and support processes (systems and other teams). The lanes are separated by the line of visibility.
For internal tools and B2B products the blueprint is often more useful than the journey map, because the pain sits backstage. Ravi sees a friendly phone call. Behind the line of visibility, the rep's notebook becomes a photo in a chat group, an order desk retypes it, and about one order in twelve picks up an error on the way. Every handoff between lanes is a place where data is copied, delayed or lost. Circle every one.
Quick check
In a service blueprint of phone ordering, where does "the order desk retypes the rep's photo into the back office" belong?
The shop owner never sees the order desk, so its work is backstage. Showing exactly this hidden work is why blueprints exist. The rep's call is frontstage because Ravi talks to the rep directly.
Do it
Plan one field visit, take timed notes, cost the workarounds, and draw the blueprint.
-
Write a one-page visit plan
One workflow, one real occurrence, clear permission, a safety note and the questions you'll keep in mind.
Markdown## Field visit plan: morning delivery, Ama's store Workflow: receiving the DC delivery in the Store app (GRN) Why now: staff say receiving "takes 20 minutes"; GRN sync errors rose this month When: Thursday, truck due 7:30 am; stay until shelves are filled (2 hours max) Permission: Ama (store manager) agreed; area manager informed Who we shadow: the clerk on that day's roster, not the store's best clerk Safety: stand behind the yellow line at the dock; no photos of customers Bring: field-note sheet, watch, phone (photos only with permission), water Roles: Imran observes and asks; Tomás times steps and writes Keep in mind: - Where does the clerk leave the Store app, and why? - Which paper, chat or spreadsheet touches this delivery? - What happens to damaged or short items? After: write up the same day; play it back to the clerk on Friday -
Take timed field notes
One line per step, with the tool or artefact, whether it's a workaround, and the person's own words.
Markdown| Time | Step | Tool or artefact | Workaround? | Quote or note | |-------|-----------------------|--------------------|-------------|----------------------------------| | 07:34 | Checks seal, papers | Delivery note | | | | 07:38 | Counts 40 cartons | Delivery note, pen | | "The note is nearly always right" | | 07:46 | Scans items into GRN | Store app, scanner | | Promo packs scan twice | | 08:04 | Writes expiry dates | Notebook (photo 2) | Yes | "The app has no place for this" | | 08:16 | Walks to front, syncs | Store Wi-Fi | Yes | No signal at the dock | | 08:22 | Photos damaged items | Store chat group | Yes | "Ama checks the group first" | | 08:25 | Moves stock to shelf | Trolley | | Older yogurt pushed to the back | -
Put a cost on the workarounds
Use your own wage figure; the point is the order of magnitude, stated with its assumptions.
OutputWorkaround minutes per delivery: 12 (expiry notebook) + 6 (walk to sync) + 3 (chat photo) = 21 Deliveries: about 1 per store per day, 320 stores 21 min x 320 = 6,720 min a day = about 112 staff hours a day Assume a staff hour costs about $3 (use your own number): 112 x $3 = about $336 a day, or about $120,000 a year Not yet counted: expired stock written off because the notebook was missed -
Draw the service blueprint
Start with the customer lane from your notes, add the frontstage and backstage lanes, then the systems. Mark workarounds and circle the handoffs.
Markdown## Service blueprint: partner shop phone order (one cycle) Customer (Ravi): writes low items on calendar -> reads list on 6 pm call -> gets stock Thursday, 2 lines wrong -> phones rep Frontstage (rep): calls -> writes order in notebook -> promises a fix --- line of visibility --- Backstage (desk): photo arrives in reps' chat group -> retypes into back office -> logs the correction after delivery Support (systems): back office order -> DC picking -> delivery -> invoice Workarounds: calendar list, rep's notebook, chat photo, retyping Handoffs: rep -> chat group, chat group -> desk, desk -> back office Cost: about 75 desk hours a week; about 1 order in 12 corrected -
Play it back
Show the blueprint or journey map to the person you watched and to one other person who does the same job. Ask what you got wrong and what happens on a bad day. Change the drawing, not their words.
Bring it to your team
Ask these before anyone draws a solution for frontline work.
- When did someone on this team last watch this work happen, in person, at a real site?
- Which workarounds did we see, and what job does each one do that our product doesn't?
- What does each workaround cost in minutes and errors across all our sites?
- Which backstage handoffs does this feature remove, add or move?
- If we switch off the chat group or the spreadsheet, what will people lose?
Red flags
- A journey map drawn in a meeting room without a single visit.
- Only the best store or the friendliest shop visited.
- A plan to "ban the spreadsheet" with nothing that replaces what it does.
- A visit timed for a quiet demo instead of a real delivery or a real order.
- Field notes full of complaints and no timed steps.
Practice
Find and cost the workarounds
Tomás shadowed a nightly stock count in one store. Each store counts one aisle every night after closing. From his notes, list each workaround, the need behind it, and its cost per night across all 320 stores.
21:30 Store closes. Two staff print the count sheet from the back office (2 min)
21:32 Count aisle 4 on paper, about 180 items (35 min)
22:07 Recount 12 items where shelf and backstore differ (10 min)
22:17 One staffer types the paper counts into a spreadsheet on the office PC (25 min)
"The Store app can't do counts."
22:42 Emails the spreadsheet to the area manager, who forwards it to stock control (2 min)
22:44 Posts "done" and a photo of the sheet in the store chat group (1 min)
"So the area manager sees we finished tonight."- You found at least four workarounds: printing, typing into the spreadsheet, emailing, and the chat post
- Each need is written as a need ("counts reach stock control the same night"), not as a feature
- You treated the recount as part of the real job, or explained why you counted it
- Your cost uses minutes × stores and states its assumptions
- You noticed at least one risk the minutes don't capture, such as typing errors
Show a model answer
Workarounds and needs. Printing the sheet (2 min): "I need the count list in my hand while I walk the aisle." Typing paper counts into a spreadsheet (25 min): "I need to record counts once, where I count." Emailing it on (2 min): "Counts should reach stock control the same night without me." Chat photo (1 min): "My area manager needs to see that we finished." The recount is real work; the walk to the backstore might shrink if the scanner showed backstore stock, so note it as a question.
Cost. 2 + 25 + 2 + 1 = 30 minutes per store per night. 30 × 320 = 9,600 minutes, about 160 staff hours a night, mostly late at night. Not counted: typing errors in the spreadsheet, and counts lost when the email is missed.
Blueprint a wrong-delivery fix
When Ravi's delivery has wrong lines, this happens: he phones his rep; the rep writes it in his notebook and posts a message in the reps' chat group; the order desk finds the original order in the back office and raises a correction; the DC adds the missing items to Ravi's next delivery; finance adjusts the invoice a week later. Draw this as a text blueprint with four lanes, mark the line of visibility, the workarounds and the handoffs, and name the step where you would expect most delays.
- Four lanes: customer, frontstage, backstage, support systems
- The line of visibility sits between the rep and the order desk
- The notebook and the chat message are marked as workarounds
- At least three handoffs are named
- You name a likely delay and say why, such as the invoice fix a week later
Show a model answer
Customer (Ravi): finds wrong lines -> phones rep -> waits -> gets items next delivery
-> checks invoice a week later
Frontstage (rep): takes call -> writes in notebook (workaround) -> posts in chat (workaround)
--- line of visibility ---
Backstage (desk): finds original order -> raises correction in back office
Support: DC adds items to next pick -> finance adjusts invoice (weekly batch)
Handoffs: Ravi -> rep, rep -> chat group -> desk, desk -> DC, desk -> financeThe likely delay is the finance adjustment, which runs weekly, so Ravi pays a wrong invoice or argues about it. The chat message is the likeliest place for a correction to get lost, because it scrolls away among 40 reps' messages.
Check yourself
On visits you notice that every receiving clerk keeps a notebook of expiry dates. Head office wants to ban the notebooks to push adoption of the Store app. What do you recommend first?
The notebook is a working solution to a real need. Banning it before the app covers its jobs creates expired stock and a new hidden workaround. Ignoring it misses the finding. Photographing it adds a step without solving anything.
Which finding most needs a service blueprint rather than a journey map?
The retyping happens backstage, out of the shop owner's sight, across several teams and systems. That is what a blueprint shows. The other three are about one person's experience of a screen or a wait, which a journey map handles well.
You can visit only one store in person for a receiving study. Which plan teaches you the most?
A real delivery at an ordinary store shows actual work, and the diary study extends it to more sites and shifts cheaply. A demo shows the official version. The best store hides the workarounds others need. Timestamps tell you how long things took but not what people did in between.
Flashcards
Key takeaways
- People describe the official process. Watching shows the tacit steps, the environment and the workarounds.
- Go to a real occurrence of the work, take the apprentice stance, time the steps and ask about what you see.
- Each workaround is a missed need plus the user's own solution. Read it like a spec and cost it across all sites.
- A journey map shows one person's steps over time; a service blueprint shows the backstage handoffs where internal tools usually hurt.
- Never retire a workaround until the product does every job it did.
Further reading
- Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems, Hugh Beyer and Karen Holtzblatt, Morgan Kaufmann, 1998
- Contextual Inquiry: Inspire Design by Observing and Interviewing Users in Their Context, Kim Flaherty, Nielsen Norman Group, 2020
- Why Field-Study Sessions Go Wrong, Mayya Azarova, Nielsen Norman Group, 2022
- Service Blueprints: Definition, Sarah Gibbons, Nielsen Norman Group, 2017; and "Designing Services That Deliver", G. Lynn Shostack, Harvard Business Review, 1984
- M-Pesa, Wikipedia, for the 2005 pilot and the 2007 launch